Picturing Prevalence and Inequalities in Cancer Screening Attendance to Population-Based Programs in Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.19443Keywords:
Early Detection of Cancer, Mass Screening, Neoplasms/diagnosis, Neoplasms/prevention and control, Portugal, Socioeconomic FactorsAbstract
Introduction: Screening is effective in reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of, and income-related inequalities in, screening attendance, in Portugal for population-based screening programs.
Methods: Data from the Portuguese Health Interview Survey 2019 was used. Variables included in the analysis were self-reported: mammography, pap smear test, fecal occult blood test. Prevalence and concentration indices were computed at national/regional level. We analyzed: up-to-date screening (within recommended age/interval), under-screening (never or overdue screening), and over-screening (due to frequency higher than recommended or screening outside target group).
Results: Up-to-date screening rates were 81.1%, 72%, and 40%, for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer, respectively. Never-screening was 3.4%, 15.7%, and 39.9%, for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Over-screening related with frequency was highest for cervical cancer; in breast cancer, over-screening was observed outside recommended age, affecting one third of younger women and one fourth of older women. In these cancers, over-screening was concentrated among women with higher income. Never-screening was concentrated among individuals with lower income for cervical cancer and higher income for colorectal cancer. Beyond the recommended age, 50% of individuals never underwent screening for colorectal cancer and 41% of women never underwent screening for cervical cancer.
Conclusion: Overall, screening attendance was high, and inequalities were low in the case of breast cancer screening. The priority for colorectal cancer should be to increase screening attendance.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Globocan 2020. [cited 2022 Oct 05]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home.
Gini A, Jansen EE, Zielonke N, Meester RG, Senore C, Anttila A, et al. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2020;127:224-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.014
Basu P, Ponti A, Anttila A, Ronco G, Senore C, Vale DB, et al. Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in the European Union Member States—summary results from the second European screening report. Int J Cancer. 2018;142:44-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31043
Massat NJ, Dibden A, Parmar D, Cuzick J, Sasieni PD, Duffy SW. Impact of screening on breast cancer mortality: the UK program 20 years on. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:455-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0803
von Karsa L, Ronc G, Ponti A, Malila N, Arbyn M, Segnan N, et al. Cancer screening in the European union: report on the implementation of the council recommendation on cancer screening – first report. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2008.
Direção-Geral da Saúde. Programa nacional para as doenças oncológicas. Avaliação e monitorização dos rastreios oncológicos organizados de base populacional. 2019/2020. Lisboa: DGS; 2021.
Tribunal de Contas. Auditoria ao acesso a cuidados de saúde oncológicos no SNS 2017-2020. Relatório N.11/2022, 2ª Secção. Lisboa: TC; 2022.
Serviço de Saúde da Região Autónoma da Madeira. Madeira inicia programa de rastreio de base populacional do cancro do colo do útero. 2022.
[cited 2022 Nov 08]. Available from: https://www.sesaram.pt/portal/o-sesaram/comunicacao/noticias/2503-madeira-inicia-programa-de-rastreio-de-basepopulacional-do-cancro-do-colo-do-utero.
Centro de Oncologia dos Açores. Relatório de atividades 2021. [cited 2022 Nov 08]. Available from: https://portal.azores.gov.pt/documents/37454/deb301cf-e881-3390-9175-ed4777b7ff11.
Portugal. Despacho n.º 8254/2017. Diário da República, II Série, n.º 183 (2017/09/21). p.20788-9.
Gianino MM, Lenzi J, Bonaudo M, Fantini MP, Siliquini R, Ricciardi W, et al. Organized screening programmes for breast and cervical cancer in 17 EU countries: trajectories of attendance rates. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6155-5
Palència L, Espelt A, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Puigpinós R, Pons-Vigués M, Pasarín MI, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:757-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq003
World Health Organization. Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
Burton-Jeangros C, Cullati S, Manor O, Courvoisier DS, Bouchardy C, Guessous I. Cervical cancer screening in Switzerland: cross-sectional trends (1992–2012) in social inequalities. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27:167-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw113
Willems B, Bracke P. Education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe? Int J Public Health. 2018;63:93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1045-7
Mahumud RA, Keramat SA, Ormsby GM, Sultana M, Rawal LB, Alam K. et al. Wealth-related inequalities of women’s knowledge of cervical cancer screening and service utilisation in 18 resource-constrained countries: evidence from a pooled decomposition analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01159-7
De Prez V, Jolidon V, Willems B, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C, Bracke P. Cervical cancer (over) screening in Belgium and Switzerland: trends and social inequalities. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30:552-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa041
Jolidon V, De Prez V, Willems B, Bracke P, Cullati S, Burton-Jeangros C. Never and under cervical cancer screening in Switzerland and Belgium: trends and inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09619-z
Arbyn M, Rebolj M, De Kok IM, Fender M, Becker N, O’Reilly M, et al. The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2671–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.016
Willems B, Bracke P. The impact of regional screening policies on the diffusion of cancer screening participation in Belgium: time trends in educational inequalities in Flanders and Wallonia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018;18:943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3746-x
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Inquérito Nacional de Saúde 2019. 2020. [cited 2022 Nov 07]. Available from: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_destaques&DESTAQUESdest_boui=414434213&DESTAQUESmodo=2.
Eurostat. Glossary: Equivalised disposable income. 2021. [cited 2023 Mar 29]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Equivalised_disposable_income.
Quintal C, Antunes M. Mirror, mirror on the wall, when are inequalities higher, after all? Analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening in 30 European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2022;312:115371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115371
Devaux M. Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2015;16:21-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4
Mullachery P, Silver D, Macinko J. Changes in health care inequity in Brazil between 2008 and 2013. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0431-8
San Sebastián M, Mosquera PA, Ng N, Gustafsson PE. Health care on equal terms? Assessing horizontal equity in health care use in Northern Sweden. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27:637-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx031
Quintal C, Antunes M. Equidade na utilização de consultas médicas em Portugal: na saúde e na doença, na riqueza e na pobreza?, Acta Med Port. 2020;33:93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.12278
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health for everyone? In: Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyzing Health equity using survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6933-3
O’Donnell O, O’Neill S, Van Ourti T, Walsh B. Conindex: estimation of concentration indices. Stata J. 2016;16:112-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1601600112
Khan H, Shaaban N, Peleteiro B. Faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use in Portugal: results from the National Health Survey 2014. J Med Screen. 2020;27:171-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141319891456
Dourado F, Carreira H, Lunet N. Mammography use for breast cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23:386-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cks103
Chkotua S, Peleteiro B. Peer reviewed: mammography use in Portugal: national health survey 2014. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:e100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.170054
Oliveira M, Peleteiro B, Lunet N. Cytology use for cervical cancer screening in Portugal: results from the 2005/2006 National Health Survey. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24:253-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt077
Rukhadze L, Lunet N, Peleteiro B. Cervical cytology use in Portugal: results from the National Health Survey 2014. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019:45:1286-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13974
Bartley SJ, Benard V, Tai E, Rockwell T, Kenney K, Richardson LC. Are uninsured women in a national screening program having longer intervals between cervical cancer screening tests? Prev Med. 2020;135:106078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106078
Regional Health Administration of Algarve. Activity report 2018. [cited 2023 Mar 29]. Available from: https://www.arsalgarve.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/Relatorio_de-_Atividades_2018_ARS_Algarve_homologado.pdf.
Howard M, Agarwal G, Lytwyn A. Accuracy of self-reports of pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9228-4
Aranda E, Franck JE, Ringa V, Sassenou J, Coeuret-Pellicer M, Rigal L, et al. Social inequalities in participation in cancer screening: does the mode of data collection matter? The CONSTANCES cohort. Eur J Publ Health. 2021;31:602-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab055
Brown RF, Muller TR, Olsen A. Australian women’s cervical cancer screening attendance as a function of screening barriers and facilitators. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:396-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.038
Vaccarella S, Lortet-Tieulent J, Saracci R, Conway DI, Straif K, Wild CP. Reducing social inequalities in cancer: evidence and priorities for research, vol. 168. IARC Scientific Publications. Lyon: IARC; 2019.
Monteiro H, Tavares F, Reis J, Ferreira G, Campos MJ, Costa S, et al. Colorectal screening program in northern Portugal: first findings. Acta Med Port. 2022;35:164-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.15904
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
