Strategies for the Promotion of Primary Health Care Research in Portugal: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.19514Keywords:
Health Services Research, Portugal, Primary Health Care, Program Evaluation, ResearchAbstract
Introduction: There are several barriers discouraging clinicians from undertaking research, including insufficient funding, lack of time, organizational issues and lack of support. The strengthening of research capacity is perceived from three levels: characteristics of the researcher, the environment, and organizational issues. To date, Portugal is lacking studies on this subject. The aim of this study was to identify the best practices to promote research in Portuguese Primary Health Care.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with family doctors with broadly recognized research work and other stakeholders. We selected a sample by convenience and snowball sampling. From a total of 14 doctors invited by email, 12 responded positively, and we subsequently included two other stakeholders. We conducted the interviews in digital or face-to-face formats. Two team members handled the coding of interviews independently. We kept all recordings and transcripts confidential, only accessible to researchers.
Results: We identified 16 strategies: 1) increasing institutional support; 2) creating support structures; 3) redefining the residency program; 4) investing in research training; 5) redefining curriculum evaluation; 6) establishing dedicated time for research; 7) increasing funding; 8) improving access to research data; 9) being a research driver; 10) establishing a research culture; 11) working in collaboration; 12) creating formally organized research groups; 13) creating autonomous research centers; 14) improving the definition of the research subjects and study designs; 15) reviewing procedures for ethics’ committees; and 16) reviewing the current selection of articles for publication.
Conclusion: Overall, a greater proportion of interviewees identified the following as the most relevant strategies for research promotion: institutional support, including technical and scientific support from public institutions, private entities and academic centers; the reorganization of working hours with protected time for research; increased funding directed towards research and breaking isolation in research, promoting teamwork with clinicians within the same area or from different professional backgrounds.
Downloads
References
Ponka D, Coffman M, Fraser-Barclay KE, Fortier RD, Howe A, Kidd M, et al. Fostering global primary care research: a capacity-building approach. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002470
World Health Organization. Declaration of Astana. Global Conference on Primary Health Care: Astana, Kazakhstan, 25 and 26 October 2018. 2018. [cited 2022 Sept 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health/declaration/gcphc-declaration.pdf.
O’Neill B, Aversa V, Rouleau K, Lazare K, Sullivan F, Persaud N. Identifying top 10 primary care research priorities from international stakeholders using a modified Delphi method. PloS One. 2018;13:e0206096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206096
Abreu J, Reis P, Cardoso S, Reis S. Investigação em medicina geral e familiar: tendências e vazios. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2020;36:408-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v36i5.12686
Flenady T, Dwyer T, Kahl J, Sobolewska A, Reid-Searl K, Signal T. Research capacity-building for clinicians: understanding how the research facilitator role fosters clinicians’ engagement in the research process. Health Res Policy Sys. 2022;20:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00849-8
Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S27638
McIntyre E, Brun L, Cameron H. Researcher development program of the primary health care research, evaluation and development strategy. Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17:114-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY10049
Hilder J, Mickan S, Mickan S, Noble C, Weir KA, Wenke R. Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation. Health Res Pol Sys. 2020;18:1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00572-2
Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchett M, Williams C, Haines T. Research culture in allied health: a systematic review. Aust J Prim Health. 2016;22:294-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15122
Yaphe J. Expandir a capacidade de investigação em cuidados primários em Portugal: uma proposta. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2015;31:370-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i6.11620
Huas C, Petek D, Diaz E, Muñoz-Perez MA, Torzsa P, Collins C. Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: the views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe. Eur J Gen Pract. 2019;25:25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2018.1546282
Weber-Main AM, Finstad DA, Center BA, Bland CJ. An adaptive approach to facilitating research productivity in a primary care clinical department. Acad Med. 2013;88:929-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295005f
Vogel I. Strengthening learning from experience. UK collaborative on development research | UKCDR. 2011. [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.ukcdr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/UKCDS_Capacity_Building_Report_July_2012.pdf.
Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-19
Collins C. The EGPRN research strategy for general practice in Europe. Eur J Gen Pract. 2022;28:136-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2022.2080815
Binienda J, Neale AV, Wallace LS. Future directions for practice-based research networks (PBRNs): a CERA survey. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:917-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180069
Peters S, Chakraborty SP, Barton C, Sturgiss EA, Mazza D, De Leon Santiago M, et al. Building a practice-based research network for healthcare integration: a protocol paper for a mixed-method project. BMJ Open. 2022;12:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060524
Elder NC. Practice-based research today: A changing primary care landscape requires changes in practice-based research network (PBRN) research. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32:647-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190253
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
