Needs for Care, Service Use and Quality of Life in Dementia: 12-Month Follow-Up of the Actifcare Study in Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20427Keywords:
Caregivers, Dementia, Health Services Accessibility, Needs AssessmentAbstract
Introduction: The intermediate stages of dementia are relatively under-researched, including in Portugal. The Actifcare (ACcess to TImely Formal Care) EU-JPND project studied people with mild-moderate dementia, namely their needs, access to and use of community services (e.g., day centers, home support). In our baseline assessment of the Portuguese Actifcare cohort, the unmet needs of some participants would call for formal support, which was not always accessible or used. We now report the main results of the 12-month follow-up, analyzing changes in needs, service (non)use, quality of life and related variables.
Methods: This was a longitudinal, observational study using a convenience sample of 54 dyads of people with dementia and their family carers. Our main outcomes were the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) and the Resources Utilization in Dementia. Clinical-functional, quality of life, psychological distress and caregiving-related assessments were also used.
Results: At follow-up, the cognitive and functional status of people with dementia declined (p < 0.001), and their neuropsychiatric symptoms increased (p = 0.033). Considering CANE interviewers’ ratings, the total needs of people with dementia increased at follow-up (p < 0.001) but not the unmet needs. Quality of life was overall stable. The use of formal care did not increase significantly, but informal care did in some domains. Carers’ depressive symptoms increased (p = 0.030) and perseverance time decreased (p = 0.045). However, carers’ psychological distress unmet needs were lower (p = 0.007), and their stress and quality of life remained stable.
Conclusion: People with dementia displayed complex biopsychosocial unmet needs. Their cognitive-functional decline over one year was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in any pattern of unmet need, nor of service use. Reliance on informal care (namely supervision) may have contributed to this. Caregiving-related outcomes evolved according to different trends, although stability was almost the rule. Primary carers were even more present at follow-up, without an apparently heavier toll on their own needs, burden, and quality of life. Overall, this longitudinal study comprehensively assessed Portuguese community-dwelling people with dementia. Despite the lack of generalizability, participants’ needs remained overall stable and partly unmet over one year. Longer follow-up periods are needed to understand such complex processes.
Downloads
References
GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e105-5.
Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali G, Wu YT, Prina M. World Alzheimer report 2015: the global impact of dementia. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2015.
Jönsson L, Tate A, Frisell O, Wimo A. The costs of dementia in Europe: An updated review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2023;41:59-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01212-z
Pires CL, Duarte N, Paúl C, Ribeiro O. Custos associados à prestação informal de cuidados a pessoas com demência. Acta Med Port. 2020;33:559-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11922
Gonçalves-Pereira M, Verdelho A, Prina M, Marques MJ, Xavier M. How many people live with dementia in Portugal? A discussion paper of national estimates. P J Public Health. 2021;39:58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000516503
Costa J, Borges M, Encarnação R, Firmino H, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Lindeza P, et al. Custo e carga da doença de Alzheimer nos idosos em Portugal. Sinapse. 2021;21:201-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46531/sinapse/AO/210055/2021
Portugal. Office of Assistant Secretary of State and Health. Dispatch no. 5988/2018 - Estratégia da Saúde na Área das Demências. Diário da República, II Série, no. 116 (2018/06/19).
Balsinha C, Iliffe S, Dias S, Freitas A, Barreiros FF, Gonçalves-Pereira M. Dementia and primary care teams: obstacles to the implementation of Portugal’s Dementia strategy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23:e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000876
Gonçalves-Pereira M, Leuschner A. Portugal. In: Burns A, Robert P, editors. Dementia care: international perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019:219-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198796046.003.0029
Werner P, Mittelman MS, Goldstein D, Heinik J. Family stigma and caregiver burden in Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontologist. 2012;52:89-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr117
Stephan A, Bieber A, Hopper L, Joyce R, Irving K, Zanetti O, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1
Kerpershoek L, de Vugt M, Wolfs C, Jelley H, Orrell M, Woods B, et al. Access to timely formal dementia care in Europe: protocol of the Actifcare (ACcess to Timely Formal Care) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1877-5
Gonçalves-Pereira M, Marques MJ, Balsinha C, Fernandes A, Machado A, Verdelho A, et al. Necessidades de cuidados e recurso aos serviços na demência: avaliação inicial da coorte Portuguesa no Estudo Actifcare. Acta Med Port. 2019;32:355-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11136
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV-TR: manual de diagnóstico e estatística das perturbações mentais. 4a ed. Lisboa: Climepsi Editores; 2002.
Morris JC. The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Reynolds T, Thornicroft G, Abas M, Woods B, Hoe J, Leese M, et al. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE). Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:444-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.5.444
Wimo A, Gustavsson A, Jonsson L, Winblad B, Hsu MA, Gannon B. Application of resource utilization in dementia (RUD) instrument in a global setting. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:429-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.06.008
Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Orrell M. The needs of people with dementia living at home from user, caregiver and professional perspectives: a crosssectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-43
Fernandes L, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Leuschner A, Martins S, Sobral M, Azevedo L, et al. Validation study of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) in Portugal. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21:94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208008041
Logsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L. Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:510-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016
Bárrios H, Verdelho A, Narciso S, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Logsdon R, de Mendonça A. Quality of life in patients with cognitive impairment: validation of the Quality of Life–Alzheimer’s Disease scale in Portugal. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25:1085-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000379
Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, Smith V, MacMillan A, Shelley T, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12:233-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.12.2.233
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5
Lawton M, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Nurs Res. 1969;19:278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-197005000-00029
Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, van Gorp B, Redekop WK. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1005-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-5994-6
Voormolen DC, van Exel J, Brouwer W, Sköldunger A, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Irving K, et al. A validation study of the CarerQol instrument in informal caregivers of people with dementia from eight European countries. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:577-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02657-5
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
Greene JG, Smith R, Gardiner M, Timbury GC. Measuring behavioural disturbance of elderly demented patients in the community and its effects on relatives: a factor analytic study. Age Ageing. 1982;11:121-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/11.2.121
Kraijo H, Brouwer W, de Leeuw R, Schrijvers G, van Exel J. The perseverance time of informal carers of dementia patients: validation of a new measure to initiate transition of care at home to nursing home care. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40:631-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-132420
Hancock GA, Reynolds T, Woods B, Thornicroft G, Orrell M. The needs of older people with mental health problems according to the user, the carer, and the staff. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;18:803-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.924
Orrell M, Hancock GA, Liyanage KC, Woods B, Challis D, Hoe J. The needs of people with dementia in care homes: the perspectives of users, staff and family caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2008;20:941-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610208007266
Richters A, Melis RJ, van Exel NJ, Olde Rikkert MG, van der Marck MA. Perseverance time of informal caregivers for people with dementia: construct validity, responsiveness and predictive validity. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0251-0
O’Shea E, Hopper L, Marques M, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Woods, B, Jelley H, et al. A comparison of self and proxy quality of life ratings for people with dementia and their carers: a European prospective cohort study. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24:162-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1517727
King D, Farina N, Burgon C, Feeney Y, Berwald S, Bustard E, et al. Factors associated with change over time in quality of life of people with dementia: longitudinal analyses from the MODEM cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03142-z
Hutchinson C, Worley A, Khadka J, Milte R, Cleland J, Ratcliffe J. Do we agree or disagree? A systematic review of the application of preference-based instruments in self and proxy reporting of quality of life in older people. Soc Sci Med. 2022;305:115046.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115046
Hutchinson C, Whitehurst DG, Crocker M, Lay K, Engel L, Ratcliffe J. Measuring quality of life in residential aged care using the EQ-5D-5L: a crosssectional study on the impact of cognition level and proxy perspective on interrater agreement. Health Soc Care Community. 2023;2023:1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5839776
Tapia Muñoz T, Slachevsky A, León-Campos MO, Madrid M, Caqueo-Urízar A, Rohde GC, et al. Predictors of unmet needs in Chilean older people with dementia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1131-1
Horik JO, Collins R, Martyr A, Henderson C, Jones RW, Knapp M, et al. Limited receipt of support services among people with mild-to-moderate dementia: Findings from the IDEAL cohort. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;37:10.1002/gps.5688.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5688
Schmachtenberg T. Structures for the care of people with dementia: a European comparison. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08715-7
Jessen F, Georges J, Wortmann M, Benham-Hermetz S. What matters to patients with Alzheimer’s disease and their care partners? Implications for understanding the value of future interventions. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9:550-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.22
Ribeiro O, Teixeira L, Duarte N, Azevedo MJ, Araújo L, Barbosa S, et al. Versão Portuguesa da escala breve de redes sociais de Lubben (LSNS-6). Kairós-Gerontol. 2012;15:217-34.
Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck JC, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006;46:503-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.4.503
Ulstein I, Wyller TB, Engedal K. The relative stress scale, a useful instrument to identify various aspects of carer burden in dementia? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22:61-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1654
Bruvik FK, Ulstein ID, Ranhoff AH, Engedal K. The effect of coping on the burden in family carers of persons with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17:973-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.790928
Borges-Machado F, Barros D, Ribeiro Ó, Carvalho J. The effects of COVID-19 home confinement in dementia care: physical and cognitive decline, severe neuropsychiatric symptoms and increased caregiving burden. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020;35:153331752097672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317520976720
Cheng ST. Dementia caregiver burden: a research update and critical analysis. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0818-2
Gonçalves-Pereira M, Carmo I, Silva JA, Papoila AL, Mateos R, Zarit SH. Caregiving experiences and knowledge about dementia in Portuguese clinical outpatient settings. Int Psychogeriatrics. 2010;22:270-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209991050
Røsvik J, Michelet M, Engedal K, Bieber A, Broda A, Gonçalves-Pereira M, et al. Interventions to enhance access to and utilization of formal community care services for home dwelling persons with dementia and their informal carers. A scoping review. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24:200-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1523876
Balsinha C, Marques MJ, Gonçalves-Pereira M. A brief assessment unravels unmet needs of older people in primary care: a mixed-methods evaluation of the SPICE tool in Portugal. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018;19:637-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423617000950
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
