Parcial Nephrectomies - results of 12 years from an Oncology Institution

Authors

  • Rui Freitas Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Ricardo Cruz Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Luís Antunes Serviço de Epidemiologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Paulo Araújo Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Pedro Silva Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Luis Saraiva Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Sanches Magalhães Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Vitor Moreira Silva Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • António Morais Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Francisco Lobo Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.
  • Jorge Oliveira Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.5231

Keywords:

Chronic Disease, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Nephrectomy, Renal Insufficiency.

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma has been increasing in recent years, especially due to incidental cases, and thus indication for nephron-preserving surgery has also risen.
Objectives: To review a series of partial nephrectomies from an oncology institution namely technique features, survival and change in renal function.
Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients with renal tumors that were submitted to partial nephrectomy at our institution between January 2000 and December 2012.
Results: A total 156 partial nephrectomies were performed, 85 in men and 71 in women, with mean overall age of 62 ± 15 years. Surgical approach was transperitoneal laparoscopic in 23 cases with the remainder 133 through lumbotomy. Mean ischemic time was < 25 min in all patients and complication rate was 10.9 %, mostly corresponding grade 2 and 3 of the Clavien-Dindo scale. Mean tumor size was 2.9 ± 1.4 cm and the surgical margin was focally affected by tumor in 9.6% of cases. Histologically, 26.2% of cases corresponded to clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with oncocytomas being the most common benign neoplasm with 14.7% of the total. There were 4 cases of recurrence and one case death at follow-up. The mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate was -5.3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (p < 0.001). There was no association between warm ischemia time, body mass index, age, ASA score, presence of complications with this decrease in glomerular filtration rate.
Discussion: Our positive surgical margins cases were slightly above what is described in literature, however we didn’t find any predictive factor for such finding and ultimately there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or influence in survival in all these cases. Even though there was a significant decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, warm ischemia time was very low and only five patients presented with de novo eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and two patients started hemodialysis. A high volume center seems to be critical for technique optimization and complication management.
Conclusion: Our series of partial nephrectomies presents oncological results and preservation of renal function similar to those published in literature. This is a safe technique with good results, justifying its growth.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rui Freitas, Serviço de Urologia. Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil. Porto.

6th year resident of the Urology Department of IPO Porto

Downloads

Published

2016-02-29

How to Cite

1.
Freitas R, Cruz R, Antunes L, Araújo P, Silva P, Saraiva L, Magalhães S, Silva VM, Morais A, Lobo F, Oliveira J. Parcial Nephrectomies - results of 12 years from an Oncology Institution. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2016 Feb. 29 [cited 2022 Dec. 7];29(2):123-30. Available from: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5231

Issue

Section

Original