Two Ethical Criticisms of the New Mental Health Law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.21105

Keywords:

Involuntary Treatment, Psychiatric, Mental Health, Portugal, Psychiatry/ethics, Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence

Abstract

N/a.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Portugal. Lei n.º 35/2023. Diário da República, I Série, n.º 141 (21/07/2023).

Vieira F, Cabral A, Trancas B, Almeida F, Barreto H, Robalo I, et al. Novos tempos, novas realidades, novas leis: a continuidade, a mudança e os novos-velhos desafios em psiquiatria e saúde mental em Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2023;36:773-5.

Nyttingnes O, Benth JŠ, Hofstad T, Rugkåsa J. The relationship between area levels of involuntary psychiatric care and patient outcomes: a longitudinal national register study from Norway. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23:112.

Martinho SM, Santa-Rosa B, Silvestre M. Where the public health principles meet the individual: a framework for the ethics of compulsory outpatient treatment in psychiatry. BMC Med Ethics. 2022;23:77.

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.

Portugal. Decreto-Lei n.º 78/87. Diário da República, I Série, n.º 40 (17/02/1987).

Published

2024-06-03

How to Cite

1.
M. Martinho S, Pinto Almeida S. Two Ethical Criticisms of the New Mental Health Law. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 3 [cited 2024 Jun. 30];37(6):487-8. Available from: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/21105

Issue

Section

Letters to the Editor