Gender Disparities in the Academic Performance of Neurology Residents in Portugal

Authors

  • Filipa Ladeira *Shared first co-authorship. Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Integrated Responsibility. Unidade Local de Saúde São José. Lisbon. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-3258
  • Patrícia Faustino *Shared first co-authorship. Neurology Department. Unidade Local de Saúde São José. Lisbon. 
  • Mafalda Soares *Shared first co-authorship. Neurology Department. Unidade Local de Saúde São José. Lisbon.
  • Vanessa Carvalho *Shared first co-authorship. Neurology Department. Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria. Lisbon.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.21637

Keywords:

Gender Equity, Internship and Residency, Neurologists, Neurology, Physicians, Women, Portugal, Sexism

Abstract

Implicit bias has been linked to gender disparities in medical careers, impacting not only access to leadership positions but also early career opportunities. We aimed to evaluate if there were differences in the assessment of Neurology residents according to gender. We collected publicly available grades and rankings of two major evaluations that residents are submitted to, one at the beginning and another at the end of the neurology residency program, the National Board Exam and neurology examination, respectively. The National Board Examination is a multiple-choice gender-blinded evaluation, while the neurology examination is an oral gender-unblinded evaluation. We found that 36.5% of women and 21.6% of men were in the first quartile of the National Board Examination ranking, which reflects a similar representation among top classifications when assessed through a gender-blinded examination. On the other hand, the percentage of men who were in the top classification of NE, a gender-unblinded evaluation, was more than twice as high compared to women (37.8% vs 18.3%, p < 0.05). The findings of the present study may imply that there could be a disparity in women’s career progression among neurology residents in Portugal, although the recruitment seems balanced between genders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bewley BR. Women doctors--a review. J R Soc Med. 1995;88:399-455.

Klein R, Julien KA, Snyder ED, Koch J, Ufere NN, Volerman A, et al. Gender bias in resident assessment in graduate medical education: review of the literature. J Gen Inter Med. 2019;34:712-9.

Klein R, Ufere NN, Rao RR, Kock J, Volerman A, Snyder ED, et al. Association of gender with learner assessment in graduate medical education. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2010888.

Sulistio MS, Khera A, Squiers K, Sanghavi M, Ayers CR, Weng W, et al. Effects of gender in resident evaluations and certifying examination pass rates. BMC Med Educ. 2009;19:1-7.

Hall DA, Cahill C, Meyer AC, Peltier A, Dy-Hollins M, Goldmen M. Gender disparities in the career of neurology researchers. Neurology. 2023;100:e454- 64.

Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s principles of Internal Medicine: Volumes 1 and 2. 18th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2011.

Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JLet al. Harrison’s principles of Internal Medicine: Volumes 1 and 2. 18th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2008.

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

1.
Ladeira F, Faustino P, Soares M, Carvalho V. Gender Disparities in the Academic Performance of Neurology Residents in Portugal. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 12 [cited 2024 Jul. 16];. Available from: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/21637

Issue

Section

Short Reports