Review of Reviews (Umbrella Reviews): Step-by-Step Guide

Authors

  • Helena Donato Serviço de Documentação e Informação Científica. Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra. Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra. Coimbra; Faculdade de Medicina. Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-1268
  • Mariana Donato Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia. Unidade Local de Saúde Lisboa Ocidental. Lisboa; NOVA Medical School. Lisboa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.21796

Keywords:

Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic

Abstract

In recent years, as a result of the dramatic increase in the number of systematic reviews, a new type of systematic review, the ‘systematic reviews of systematic reviews’, also known as umbrella reviews, reviews of reviews, meta-reviews or synthesis of review, was developed. The aim of this article is to provide recommendations on how this type of systematic review should be conducted and reported to ensure its quality and usefulness. These reviews are designed to compile evidence from multiple systematic reviews of interventions into an accessible and usable document and are one of the highest levels of evidence synthesis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. [consultado 2024 fev 20] Disponível em: https://training. cochrane.org/handbook/current.

Biondi-Zoccai, editor. Umbrella reviews: evidence synthesis with overviews of reviews and meta-epidemiologic studies. Berlin: Springer; 2023.

Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21:95-100.

van der Braak K, Ghannad M, Orelio C, Heus P, Damen JA, Spijker R, et al. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols. Syst Rev. 2022;11:191.

Hoffmann F, Allers K, Rombey T, Helbach J, Hoffmann A, Mathes T, et al. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000- 2019. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;138:1-11.

Gates M, Gates A, Pieper D, Fernandes RM, Tricco AC, Moher D, et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ. 2022;378:e070849.

Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:132-40.

Bougioukas KI, Vounzoulaki E, Mantsiou CD, Papanastasiou GD, Savvides ED, Ntzani EE, et al. Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;137:58-72.

Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Fernandes RM. Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis. Evid Based Child Health. 2014;9:486-94.

Belbasis L, Bellou V, Ioannidis JP. Conducting umbrella reviews. BMJ Med. 2022;1:e000071.

Cant R, Ryan C, Kelly MA. A nine-step pathway to conduct an umbrella review of literature. NA&E. 2022;32:31-4.

Donato H, Donato M. Etapas na condução de uma revisão sistemática. Acta Med Port. 2019;32:227-35.

Fredriksson M, Olofsson H. Epistemonikos and KSR evidence. JEAHIL. 2021;17:18-2.

Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Pieper D, Tricco AC, Gates M, Gates A, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Syst Rev. 2019;8:335.

Choi GJ, Kang H. Introduction to umbrella reviews as a useful evidence- based practice. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023;12:3-11.

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

1.
Donato H, Donato M. Review of Reviews (Umbrella Reviews): Step-by-Step Guide. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];37(7-8):547-55. Available from: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/21796

Issue

Section

Review Articles