Cleft Lip and Palate: Prenatal Diagnosis, Genetic Testing, and Pregnancy Outcomes in a Tertiary Referral Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23371Keywords:
Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis, Genetic Testing, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal DiagnosisAbstract
Introduction: Orofacial clefts are common congenital malformations that may occur in isolation or as part of a syndrome. Early prenatal diagnosis provides crucial information for parental counseling, delivery planning, and multidisciplinary neonatal care. This study aimed to review orofacial cleft cases diagnosed during the prenatal period and to assess the relationship between cleft type, associated anomalies, genetic findings and pregnancy outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective study included all fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or cleft palate who received obstetric care at the Unidade Local de Saúde São João between January 2014 and December 2023. Data collected included baseline maternal characteristics, fetal sex, gestational age at diagnosis, associated anomalies, genetic and pathological evaluation and pregnancy outcomes.
Results: Forty-eight fetuses were included. Prenatal diagnosis was most often made in the second trimester (77.1%), while all first-trimester diagnoses were associated with additional anomalies. Overall, 20 fetuses (41.7%) had syndromic or non-isolated clefts, accounting for all chromosomal and genetic abnormalities. In isolated cases (58.3%), genetic testing consistently yielded normal results, with only two of them receiving a genetic diagnosis postnatally. Eighteen pregnancies were terminated, mostly in cases with associated anomalies.
Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective case series, chromosomal and genetic abnormalities were only detected in fetuses with syndromic clefts or additional anomalies. Among isolated cases, genetic testing was uniformly normal. These results reinforce that prenatal genetic testing may be most valuable when syndromic features or a strong family history are present, rather than as a routine in isolated clefts. Further multicenter studies are needed to support this approach and define standardized protocols.
Downloads
References
Farladansky-Gershnabel S, Gluska H, Halevi N, Kotser N, Sharon-Weiner M, Schreiber H, et al. Cleft lip and/or cleft palate: prenatal accuracy, postnatal course, and long-term outcomes. Children. 2022;9:1880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121880
Chmait R, Pretorius D, Moore T, Hull A, James G, Nelson T, et al. Prenatal detection of associated anomalies in fetuses diagnosed with cleft lip with or without cleft palate in utero. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:173-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2593
Celik OY, Bucak M, Saglam E, Kahraman NC, Kaymak AO, Arat O, et al. Diagnostic performance of two ultrasound techniques for the detection of cleft palate without cleft lip: axial-transverse and equal sign. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:1971-9.
Basha M, Demeer B, Revencu N, Helaers R, Theys S, Bou Saba S, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies mutations in 10% of patients with familial non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate in genes mutated in well-known syndromes. J Med Genet. 2018;55:449-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105110
Kini U. Genetics and orofacial clefts: a clinical perspective. Br Dent J. 2023;234:947-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-5994-3
Vallino-Napoli LD, Riley MM, Halliday JL. An epidemiologic study of orofacial clefts with other birth defects in Victoria, Australia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43:571-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1597/05-123
Setó-Salvia N, Stanier P. Genetics of cleft lip and/or cleft palate: association with other common anomalies. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:381-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.04.003
Beriaghi S, Myers SL, Jensen SA, Kaimal S, Chan CM, Schaefer GB. Cleft lip and palate: association with other congenital malformations. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009;33:207-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.33.3.c244761467507721
Ács M, Cavalcante BG, Bănărescu M, Wenning AS, Hegyi P, Szabó B, et al. Maternal factors increase risk of orofacial cleft: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:28104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79346-7
Cheng X, Du F, Long X, Huang J. Genetic inheritance models of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate: from monogenic to polygenic. Genes. 2023;14:1859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14101859
Divya K, Iyapparaja P, Raghavan A, Diwakar MP. Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound scans for screening cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. J Med Ultrasound. 2022;30:169-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_20_22
Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH, Park JS, Jun JK. Value of sagittal color Doppler ultrasonography as a supplementary tool in the differential diagnosis of fetal cleft lip and palate. Ultrasonography. 2017;36:53-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.16025
Chaoui R, Orosz G, Heling KS, Sarut-Lopez A, Nicolaides KH. Maxillary gap at 11-13 weeks’ gestation: marker of cleft lip and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:665-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15675
Wu S, Han J, Zhen L, Ma Y, Li D, Liao C. Prospective ultrasound diagnosis of orofacial clefts in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58:134-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22123
Sepulveda W, Wong AE, Martinez-Ten P, Perez-Pedregosa J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7484
Lakshmy SR, Rose N, Masilamani P, Umapathy S, Ziyaulla T. Absent ‘superimposed-line’ sign: novel marker in early diagnosis of cleft of fetal secondary palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:906-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21931
Lachmann R, Schilling U, Brückmann D, Weichert A, Brückmann A. Isolated cleft lip and palate: maxillary gap sign and palatino-maxillary diameter at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;44:241-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000481773
Platt LD, Devore GR, Pretorius DH. Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the “flipped face” view. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1423-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2006.25.11.1423
Ramos GA, Ylagan MV, Romine LE, D’Agostini DA, Pretorius DH. Diagnostic evaluation of the fetal face using 3-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 2008;24:215-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31819073c2
Stanier P, Moore GE. Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:R73-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh052
Beaty TH, Marazita ML, Leslie EJ. Genetic factors influencing risk to orofacial clefts: today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. F1000Res. 2016;5:2800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9503.1
Maarse W, Pistorius LR, Van Eeten WK, Breugem CC, Kon M, Van den Boogaard MJ, et al. Prenatal ultrasound screening for orofacial clefts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:434-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8895
Calzolari E, Pierini A, Astolfi G, Bianchi F, Neville AJ, Rivieri F. Associated anomalies in multi-malformed infants with cleft lip and palate: an epidemiologic study of nearly 6 million births in 23 EUROCAT registries. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143a:528-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31447
Monlleó IL, Barros AG, Fontes MI, Andrade AK, de M Brito G, Nascimento DL, et al. Diagnostic implications of associated defects in patients with typical orofacial clefts. J Pediatr. 2015;91:485-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2014.12.001
Yuan Q, Blanton SH, Hecht JT. Association of ABCA4 and MAFB with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155a:1469-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33940
Zawiślak A, Woźniak K, Agirre X, Gupta S, Kawala B, Znamirowska-Bajowska A, et al. Association of ABCA4 gene polymorphisms with cleft lip with or without cleft palate in the Polish population. Int J Environment Res Pub Health. 2021;18:11483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111483
Sheppard SE, Quintero-Rivera F. Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews(®). Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle; 1993.
Veroniki AA, Cogo E, Rios P, Straus SE, Finkelstein Y, Kealey R, et al. Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes. BMC Med. 2017;15:95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1
Babai A, Irving M. Orofacial clefts: genetics of cleft lip and palate. Genes. 2023;14:1603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14081603
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
