HIV/AIDS Indicators for Clinical Care Quality Assessment: Relevance and Utility Assessed by Health Professionals

Authors

  • Emanuel Castro Cassoco Catumbela Department of Health Information and Decision Sciences. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Department of Pathology. Faculty of Medicine. Universidade Agostinho Neto. Luanda. Angola. Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems. University of Porto. Porto.
  • Cristina Santos Department of Health Information and Decision Sciences. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems. University of Porto. Porto.
  • Alberto Freitas Department of Health Information and Decision Sciences. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems. University of Porto. Porto.
  • Carlos Costa National School of Public Health. University NOVA de Lisboa. Lisbon.
  • António Sarmento Department of Infectious Diseases. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto.
  • Altamiro Costa Pereira Department of Health Information and Decision Sciences. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems. University of Porto. Porto.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.6360

Keywords:

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, HIV Infections, Patient Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality Indicators, Health Care.

Abstract

Introduction: After conducting a systematic review of quality indicators for assessing HIV/AIDS clinical care, we aimed to assess the clinical relevance and practice utility of those indicators from the point of view of HIV/AIDS physician experts.
Material and Methods: This is an observational, cross-sectional study, in which we selected, by convenience, physicians who work in an Infectious Disease Department of a central hospital to complete two questionnaires with a core set of indicators to establish the most relevant and useful indicators for assessment of the clinical HIV/AIDS care. A Likert scale was used to rank the indicators.
Results: Eleven of thirteen physicians filled two questionnaires. From the initial list of 53 quality indicators, 21 were identified as the most relevant and useful in HIV/AIDS clinical care. The internal consistency for clinical relevance in each indicators domain was for clinical signs and symptoms (p = 0.971), for therapy (p = 0.900), for prognosis (p = 0.820) and diagnosis (p = 0.733) and for practice utility were diagnosis (p = 0.934), clinical signs (p = 0.964), laboratory examinations (p = 0.947), therapy (p = 0.583) and prognosis (p = 0.368).
Discussion: In the process of assessing the clinical relevance and practice utility of HIV/AIDS quality care indicators, it was found that the majority of physicians agreed that diagnosis and clinical symptoms and signs indicators domains are the most important for assessing the quality of care for HIV/AIDS patients.
Conclusion: This instrument should be considered as a diagnostic tool, allowing hospital administrators to identify if HIV/AIDS care is properly delivered or needs improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Catumbela ECC, Santos C, Freitas A, Costa C, Sarmento A, Costa Pereira A. HIV/AIDS Indicators for Clinical Care Quality Assessment: Relevance and Utility Assessed by Health Professionals. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2016 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 24];29(6):389-400. Available from: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/6360

Issue

Section

Original