Correction to the article “Profiles on Adolescent Internet Addiction: A Taxonomy with Latent Profiling Analysis”, Published on Acta Med Port 2022 Sep;35(9):644-651

Abstract

On page 646, Section ‘RESULTS’,
On paragraph ‘Model estimation and selection’,
Line 3, where it reads (in red):
Firstly, we examined fit statistics (Table 5), namely the Akaike Information criterion (AIC) (...)
It should read (in blue):
Firstly, we examined fit statistics (Table 3), namely the Akaike Information criterion (AIC) (...)

Line 9, where it reads (in red):
(...) (LRT = 57.33, p < 0.0001, see Table 5) (...)
It should read (in blue):
(...) (LRT = 57.33, p < 0.0001, see Table 3) (...)

On paragraph ‘Classification accuracy of the model’,
Line 1, where it reads (in red):
The probabilities of correct classification of observations are shown in the main diagonal of Table 6, (...)
It should read (in blue):
The probabilities of correct classification of observations are shown in the main diagonal of Table 4, (...)

Line 7, where it reads (in red):
The classification accuracy of the testing subsample was 96%, as shown in Table 7.
It should read (in blue):
The classification accuracy of the testing subsample was 96%, as shown in Table 5.

On page 647,
Chapter Description of profiles, 2nd paragraph, line 4, where it reads (in red):
This group scores negatively (less than 2.5, below the green, dotted bottom line) in all dimensions (Table 3), (...)
It should read (in blue):
This group scores negatively (less than 2.5, below the green, dotted bottom line) in all dimensions (Table 6), (...)

On page 648,
Line 6, where it reads (in red):
(...) equal parental control rates or absence thereof (Table 4).
It should read (in blue):
(...)equal parental control rates or absence thereof (Table 7).

2nd paragraph, line 9, where it reads (in red):
(...) compared with other profiles, are noteworthy (Table 4).
It should read (in blue):
(...) compared with other profiles, are noteworthy (Table 7).

3rd paragraph, line 7, where it reads (in red):
Here we also highlight users with the least difficulty in making friends (Table 4).
It should read (in blue):
Here we also highlight users with the least difficulty in making friends (Table 7).

4th paragraph, line 10, where it reads (in red):
(...) and lower parental control rate stood out compared with the other profiles (Table 4).
It should read (in blue):
(...) and lower parental control rate stood out compared with the other profiles (Table 7).

Article published with errors: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/17047