Health Professionals’ Perspectives on the Referral Process in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Facilitators, Barriers, and Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.23241Keywords:
Attitude of Health Personnel, Caregivers, Cognitive Dysfunction, Portugal, Referral and ConsultationAbstract
Introduction: Early detection and referral of patients with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage dementia can contribute to improved outcomes for both patients and caregivers. Few studies explore the quality and underlying context of referral decision-making by Primary Care Clinicians. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals from Northern Portugal regarding the facilitators, barriers, and solutions within the referral process to the Neurology service for patients suspected of having mild cognitive impairment.
Methods: Two face-to-face focus groups were conducted with 11 primary and secondary care professionals from Northern Portugal, with experience in the field of dementia, selected and recruited through an email invitation. The discussion focused on the benefits of referrals, the strengths and challenges faced at different levels of care, and possible improvement strategies. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis, with triangulation employed to ensure research rigor.
Results: The study identified facilitators and barriers at the levels of patients and caregivers, healthcare professionals, and the healthcare system. This process is influenced by interconnected factors, including the sociodemographic and literacy context of patients and caregivers, clinical practice regarding the application of referral criteria, and the organizational and research context of the local healthcare system concerning dementia. Solutions were proposed to overcome the highlighted barriers, whose implementation is supported by many of the facilitators described.
Conclusion: A deeper understanding of the interplay between sociodemographic, clinical, and organizational factors can lead to more objective and effective referral decisions, ultimately supporting timely diagnosis and enhancing quality of life. The findings of this study are valuable for optimizing local referral processes and may be useful in similar healthcare contexts. It is recommended that future research include the perspectives of patients and caregivers to enhance the approach to the national dementia strategy.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Dementia. [cited 2024 Jul 02]. Available from: https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/dementia.
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer’s disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:207-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70291-0
Albert M, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman H, Fox N, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:270-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
Ward A, Tardiff S, Dye C, Arrighi HM. Rate of conversion from prodromal Alzheimer’s disease to Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review of the literature. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2013;3:320-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000354370
Mitchell A, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia–meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119:252-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01326.x
Couch E, Co M, Albertyn CP, Prina M, Lawrence V. A qualitative study of informal caregiver perceptions of the benefits of an early dementia diagnosis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24:508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10957-6
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
Balsinha C, Iliffe S, Dias S, Freitas A, Grave J, Gonçalves-Pereira M. What is the present role for general practitioners in dementia care? Experiences of general practitioners, patients and family carers in Portugal. Dementia. 2021;20:1988-2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301220977710
Balsinha C, Gonçalves-Pereira M, Iliffe S, Freitas JA, Grave J. Health-care delivery for older people with dementia in primary care. In: de Mendonça Lima C, Ivbijaro G, editors. Primary care mental health in older people. Cham: Springer; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10814-4_23
Balsinha C, Iliffe S, Dias S, Freitas A, Barreiros F, Gonçalves-Pereira M. Dementia and primary care teams: obstacles to the implementation of Portugal’s Dementia Strategy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;18:23:e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423621000876
Romano R, Carter M, Anderson A, Monroe T. An integrative review of system-level factors influencing dementia detection in primary care. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020;32:299-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000230
Jaeger B, Oliveira M, Castilhos R, Chaves M. Tertiary center referral delay of patients with dementia in Southern Brazil: associated factors and potential solutions. Dement Neuropsychol. 2021;15:210-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-020008
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Anal Qual Data Routledge. 1994:173-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9
López C, Altuna M. New community and social health challenges arising from the early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). J Pers Med. 2023;13:1410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13091410
Brunton S, Pruzin J, Alford S, Hamersky C, Sabharwal A, Gopalakrishna G. Perspectives of patients, care partners, and primary care physicians on management of mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Postgrad Med. 2023;135:530-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2217025
Barrett JJ, Haley WE, Powers RE. Alzheimer’s disease patients and their caregivers: medical care issues for the primary care physician. South Med J. 1996;89:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199601000-00001
Nunes B. Ética na doença de alzheimer. 1st ed. Lisbon: LIDEL; 2018.
The American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person-Centered Care Person-Centered Care. A definition and essential elements. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:15-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13866
Adams WL, McIlvain HE, Geske JA, Porter JL. Physicians’ perspectives on caring for cognitively impaired elders. Gerontologist. 2005;45:231-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.231
Pentzek M, Wagner M, Abholz HH, Bickel H, Kaduszkiewicz H, Wiese B, et al. The value of the GP’s clinical judgment in predicting dementia: a multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69:e786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706037
McCleery J, Laverty J, Quinn T. Diagnostic test accuracy of telehealth assessment for dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;20;7:CD013786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013786.pub2
Yi J, Pittman C, Price C, Nieman C, Oh E. Telemedicine and dementia care: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22:1396-402.e18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.015
Dasari M, Kurian J, Gundraju S, Raparthi A, Medapati R. Blood-based β-amyloid and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) biomarkers in alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of their diagnostic potential. Cureus. 2025;17:e79881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.79881
Low LF, McGrath M, Swaffer K, Brodaty H. Communicating a diagnosis of dementia: a systematic mixed studies review of attitudes and practices of health practitioners. Dementia. 2019;18:2856-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301218761911
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Acta Médica Portuguesa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in the AMP are open access and comply with the requirements of funding agencies or academic institutions. The AMP is governed by the terms of the Creative Commons ‘Attribution – Non-Commercial Use - (CC-BY-NC)’ license, regarding the use by third parties.
It is the author’s responsibility to obtain approval for the reproduction of figures, tables, etc. from other publications.
Upon acceptance of an article for publication, the authors will be asked to complete the ICMJE “Copyright Liability and Copyright Sharing Statement “(http://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/info/AMP-NormasPublicacao.pdf) and the “Declaration of Potential Conflicts of Interest” (http:// www.icmje.org/conflicts-of-interest). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author to acknowledge receipt of the manuscript.
After publication, the authors are authorised to make their articles available in repositories of their institutions of origin, as long as they always mention where they were published and according to the Creative Commons license.
