Qual é o Futuro da Revisão por Pares de Preprints?

Autores

  • Richard Sever Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. New York.
  • Thiago Carvalho Freelancer. Lisbon.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.19675

Palavras-chave:

Pré-Publicações como Assunto, Revisão por Pares

Resumo

N/a.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Sever R, Roeder T, Hindle S, Sussman L, Black KJ, Argentine J, et al. bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology. bioRxiv. 2019;833400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/833400

Bloom T, Rawlinson C. New preprint server for medical research. BMJ. 2019;365:l2301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2301

Hindle S. PREreview — a new resource for the collaborative review of preprints. eLife. 2017. [cited 2023 Feb 07]. Available from: https://elifesciences.org/labs/57d6b284/prereview-a-new-resource-for-the-collaborative-review-of-preprints.

Sever R. Preprint review should form part of PhD programmes and postdoc training. Nature. 2023;613:415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00085-2

Lemberger T, Pulverer B. Review Commons — pre-journal peer review. EMBO Reports. 2019:20;e49663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201949663

Bourguet D, Rouzies E, Guillemaud T. Could ‘peer community in’ be the revolution in scientific publishing we’ve all been waiting for? The Conversation. 2017. [cited 2023 Feb 07]. Available from: https://theconversation.com/could-peer-community-in-be-the-revolution-in-scientific-publishing-weve-all-beenwaiting-for-195682.

Eisen M, Akhmanova A, Behrens TE, Diedrichsen J, Harper DM, Iordanova MD, et al. Scientific publishing: peer review without gatekeeping. eLife. 2022;11:e83889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83889

Downloads

Publicado

2023-03-07

Como Citar

1.
Sever R, Carvalho T. Qual é o Futuro da Revisão por Pares de Preprints?. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 7 de Março de 2023 [citado 30 de Junho de 2024];36(4):225-6. Disponível em: https://actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/19675

Edição

Secção

Perspectiva